- .Manually Testing Tests from Human Perspective
Human Testers can quickly identify when something looks “Odd”.
Automated test scripts don’t pick the visual issues. When tester interacts with
the software as a end user would, they able to discover usability issues and
other interface glitches. Automated test scripts can’t test these things
2 2. Exploratory Testing Can only Done Manually
Automated test only perform the actions that you tell them
to. To write Test scripts require planning and preparation to write, which
restricts the test to certain boundaries. These boundaries mean there isn’t any
room to stray from the written test to truly explore the application.
Exploratory testing
gives us the opportunity to answer questions like, “What happens if I do this?”
It enables to crave our own path throughout the test with little to no boundaries.
3 3. Errors/ bugs with Automated Test Scripts
Automated test scripts can contain bugs just like code can
have bugs. This means Automated Testing has the potential to report false
positives and false negatives. By adding human touch during the testing process
these errors can be avoidable.
4 4.Manual Testing helps us to understand the
whole problem/Application.
Without any doubt automated testing can save time and the
cost. Also it is great for getting quick results on broad level, however manual
testing allows us to understand the problem on conceptual and emotional level. Manual
Testing connects us with the end user and introduces us to level of empathy
automation doesn’t provide.
0 comments:
Post a Comment